1. 4
  1.  

  2. 2

    Excerpt:

    The threat of “infection” will be used to justify increasingly insane and authoritarian edicts, compulsory demonstration-of-fealty rituals, and eventually the elimination of all forms of dissent. Just as the Nazis believed they were waging a war against the “subhuman races,” the New Normals will be waging a war on “disease,” and on anyone who “endangers the public health” by challenging their ideological narrative. Like every other totalitarian movement, in the end, they will do whatever is necessary to purify society of “degenerate influences” (i.e., anyone who questions or disagrees with them, or who refuses to obey their every command).

    Yep. It is highly useful for the rioters, looters, and various street thugs to be legally able to wear masks, especially in states or cities with anti-mask laws. The current mask mandates makes ’em more difficult to identify and arrest.

    Is it a coincidence that Democrat governors are the ones (for the most part, there are exceptions) decreeing and enforcing these “emergency” mask mandates?

    Also what happens when an “emergency” lasts, say, years?

    1. 1

      Pretty sure it’s still a crime to walk into a bank with your face covered. Last I knew, nowhere has the law/reg been suspended/paused. Places like B.o.A. - the anti-2A banks - working with the Democrats could use their video recordings to ‘snitch’ on their customers known to own evil scary-looking gu……. Naaaaaaaaaaaah. It can’t happen here.