1.  

    Proceedings in bankruptcy court Tuesday, 29 September.

    My one wish is all the winning recipients take everything out of the ‘blue states’ (NY, etc.).

    1.  

      This is an excellent look at where we are:

      Parents who cave in to their children’s tantrums ruin any chance they’ll grow into productive, happy adults. If the Super Tantrum steals the election, the America experiment is over. The Harris Democrats will rejigger the rules so they’ll never lose and America will become a one-party banana republic featuring permanent bio-totalitarianism.

      California, New York, and Illinois are previews of coming attractions. They increasingly look like collectivist third-world dumps: the favored few ultra-rich, vanishing middle classes, masses of poor, and rampant crime, corruption, squalor, and seething unrest. And this before their underfunded pensions and welfare systems’ inevitable collapse.

      Now the question is where we go…

      1. 1

        Sounds right, but isn’t it 80% overall, not just in the 7 swing states?

        1. 1

          We’re from the government and we’re here to help…..

          …..and ‘they’ will have total(itarian) control over how every penny of that money is used by each and every citizen, with your ‘normal’ bank shortly following in lockstep due to ‘needed regulation’.

          The cashless society of total(itarian) control is on the near-event horizon.

          If the Democrats take over, the timeline will accelerate exponentially, along with the complete obliteration of The Constitution and Bill of Rights.

            1. 1

              Good. Big Tech companies benefit from a special interest federal law that gives them incredible benefits–but does not require them to act responsibly and reasonably in how they treat their users.

              Big Tech companies have responded to this gift by deplatforming and censoring anyone to the right of Matt Yglesias. Because they are acting irresponsibly and unreasonably, they deserve to lose the benefits.

              1. 1

                Phone rings at Gracie Mansion, Manhattan, NY City. (NYC Mayor’s residence while in office.)……

                Chinese Premier Xi Jinping: Herro, Mayol DeBrasio….. I wirr be brunt. You ret oul porice officel go flee - now ! You heal me !?!

                Mayor BeBlasio: Master, I cannot honor your request, Drumpf’s people have him and th……

                Chinese Premier Xi Jinping: SIRENCE DOG ! You wirr obey ol erse. Get him fleed LIGHT NOW, no ratel than midnight ! [phone slams]

                Guaranteed: ‘The Media’ will blame everyone, everything and anything other than the real thing.

                Also guaranteed: This guy is just one itty-bitty tip of many icebergs.

                Repeat after me: Diversity is our strength.

                1. 1

                  …..and thus engages the official SHTF clock.

                  Tool up, it’s coming.

                  1. 1

                    A good bet he dindoonuffin, because something matters, or something and Democrats can do no wrong anyway.

                    1. 1

                      They’re not leftists, AntiFa, #BlackLiesMatter, or anything else….. They’re Democrats….. Typical every-day, run-of-the-mill Democrats.

                      And ‘we the people’ better start realizing that and naming names far, wide and as often as possible, or what’s coming could easily make the first Civil War look like one of the modern re-enactments in Farmer Ted’s open corn field.

                        1. 1

                          My instant thoughts on reading the article:

                          1. B.O.H.I.C.A.

                          2. Typical Democrat malfeasance for total control (or in this instance, sheer stupidity by an administration that should know better) to ban and/or severely-restrict one type of firearm/weapon component/accessory….. That gets upheld in the court system….. Then ban another, then another, another and so on.

                          3. No matter which way the 10th en banc rules on the bump stock case, it’s gonna go to SCOTUS and if - a big if - if the case is given certiorari, the opinion will be the usual 4 + 4….. and ‘Him’ siding with….. ?

                          1. 1

                            The nomination was announced on 2 September…… My instant thought - which is why I completely ignored it - was that somebody at either The Babylon Bee or The Onion struck snarkeriffic gold with a posting…… Nope. He’s been nominated.

                            1. 1

                              Right. Back in June I would have agreed if someone had said “send in the troops.”

                              Trump did not. In retrospect, that response was correct.

                              If Democrat prosecutors in cities run by Democrat mayors with Democrat council members with Democrat voters with Democrat-supporting businesses typically in Democrat states want to encourage the mob to incinerate their own neighborhoods and storefronts, let ’em.

                              I mean, it would be nice if those Democrats were rational instead of Antifa allies. And I feel for the non-Democrat voters who have to suffer through this madness. But they can enjoy their own mess.

                              1. 2

                                Exactly.

                                Let them eat themselves alive.

                                1. 1

                                  Democrats will attempt to put yet another nail in the coffin of The 4th Amendment and further damage The 2nd Amendment in one case petitioned to The Court for certiorari in the upcoming term.

                                  Make no mistake about it, if granted ‘cert’, this case matters and it matters bigly-yuuuuuge.

                                  Mr. Cangilia resides in Cranston, Rhode Island.

                                  From SCOTUS Blog:

                                  …..officers questioned Edward Caniglia at his home after his wife expressed concern that he might be suicidal. They took him to a hospital and then entered the home and removed two handguns. The officers’ justification for the entry and seizures was the “community caretaking” exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement. The Supreme Court’s first case recognizing that exception, Cady v. Dombrowski, involved officers searching the trunk of a car towed after an accident. Since then the federal courts of appeals have divided on whether the exception applies to the home or only to motor vehicles. Caniglia filed a cert petition, asking the Supreme Court to resolve this split and hold that the exception cannot justify warrantless intrusions inside a home.

                                  From the petition:

                                  The Third, Seventh, Ninth, and Tenth Circuits Have Held that the Community Caretaking Exception Does Not Extend to the Home.

                                  The Fifth, Eighth, and First Circuits Have Held that the Community Caretaking Exception Can Extend to the Home.

                                  My thoughts:

                                  The 4th Amendment to The Constitution of The United States of America: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

                                  Not sure if it’s just me - and I’m not in Rio Linda - but I keep re-reading the text of The 4th Amendment and don’t see the term “community caretaking”, nor either word (“community” or “caretaking”) and I’m rather positive the word “except” (followed by a laundry list of Democrat wet dreams) is nowhere near being in The 4th Amendment either.

                                  And please remember, not only the 9th Circus Court of Appeals, but also the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that you do not have any reasonable expectation of privacy even in your own driveway - and SCOTUS has steadfastly refused to give cert to any challenge to either ruling and of course, that denial is 5-4, with ‘Him’ voting with the typical Democrats.

                                  IMHO, ‘Him’ is gonna be one of the major causes of “it” kicking off.

                                  1. 1

                                    Better (more prescient) than his usual podcast.

                                    1. 1

                                      Every one of these m-f’ers is lying about not lying when they’re lying about lying….. and it’s gone on for decades as to showing the world who they really are, yet they still get elected and re-elected.

                                      And if it hasn’t hit you yet, please realize the entire ‘game’ (it’s not a game whatsoever) is rigged so the Democrats in my county can very soon go directly against my state’s 790 Statutes and preemption vis-a-vis disarming law-abiding citizens and not give two schmittes about our current governor, the state legislature or any Florida Supreme Court decisions, which they ignore if they don’t like. They’ve already said and documented that they’re going to challenge preemption here in Broward and are being joined by several other counties - the big blue counties, of course - Miami-Dade, Palm Beach, Orange (Orlando), Nassau (Jacksonville).

                                      …..and here in Broward, it’s not 2 to 1, D to R. It’s more like 3 to 1, D to R.

                                      1. 1

                                        Thanks for sharing. It’s worth reading especially for the link to this photo comparison: https://twitter.com/davidharsanyi/status/1298354471739830273

                                        1. 1

                                          It is sad that the wisconsinrightnow.com site had to defend its decision to include useful information with this headline:

                                          “Why We’ve Decided to Tell You the Criminal Records of the Men Shot in Kenosha”

                                          There should be no defense needed. But maybe they felt the need to justify their decision to the mob.

                                          The author is a former police sergeant. That probably helps.

                                          Too bad the rest of the media can’t do the same.