1. 3
  1.  

  2. 2

    This is the video embedded in the Breitbart article: https://twitter.com/stillgray/status/1298118316951707648

    “Y’all get back to the cars… Y’all get in the cars… It’s time to go. He over there with a gun. [another voice: We’re leaving.] He’s doin’ shootin’ at us… Get in the cars. Get in the cars. [another voice: F–kin’ Go!] [another voice: They shootin’ at us, bro?]”

    Police in major metro areas have been told to stand down, or are deliberately choosing to stand down.

    Homeowners are stepping it up. But what happens when the mob shoots back?

    1. 1

      …..what happens when the mob shoots back ?

      Then their body count starts - everywhere they try to go.

      …..and of course, the Democrats will immediately demand 2A be completely eliminated with forced confiscation, etc. - but only affecting bitter clingers. The mob can do whatever they want because….. yeah.

      1. 1

        And then the mob becomes the police… And normal Americans get the reeducation treatment if they’re lucky, and the Gulag if they’re not…

        Here’s a longer version of the video (closer to 10 minutes): https://www.worldstarhiphop.com/videos/video.php?v=wshhKOi32183cR1N586N

      2. 1

        Part Two in the saga of:

        …..what happens when the mob shoots back ?

        Ask and ye shall receive….. BLM Protesters Shot By Homeowners While Marching Through Rural Town

        I’m sure there’s gonna be Part Three, Part Four, Part Five, Part Six, etc.

      3. 1

        Looking at Wisconsin’s statutes, there’s nothing saying ‘warning shots’ are not legal. There’s also nothing saying ’warning shots are legal.

        However, Wisconsin’s ‘castle doctrine’ provides that - paraphrasing/condensing….. any action to stop the threat to a person’s property or self is justified.

        Take that as you will.