If the typical Democrat was honest, he’d have simply come out saying he and the government are going to eliminate 2A state-wide….. and then deal with the consequences.
I’ll give that one thing to El Guapo. A few days before the 2008 elections, he said he would “fundamentally transform the United States’. At least he was honest. Too bad even one person went with it and voted for the…. the…. man.
If the typical Democrat was honest, he’d have simply come out saying he and the government are going to eliminate 2A state-wide….. and then deal with the consequences.
I can respect that. Disagree with it, but respect it.
So far, the Virginia Democrats seem to have backed off of door-to-door confiscation. But if there’s no grandfathering (see HB961), and the state can get a list of who owns now-prohibited stuff, why wouldn’t they confiscate items that are evidence of a crime? Don’t they have a moral obligation to seize known contraband?
It’s reasonable to ask: How do they get a list? FFLs in Virginia will presumably keep records of firearm sales. As for soon-to-be-banned suppressors, if a Democrat gets elected in November, the ATF’s National Firearms Act records might be available for perusal. Records relating to standard capacity magazines might be a bit more difficult. On the other hand, if purchased with a credit card, those records may be available via legal process. Look at Amazon agreeing to give Massachusetts state officials a data dump of its sellers.
If the typical Democrat was honest, he’d have simply come out saying he and the government are going to eliminate 2A state-wide….. and then deal with the consequences.
I’ll give that one thing to El Guapo. A few days before the 2008 elections, he said he would “fundamentally transform the United States’. At least he was honest. Too bad even one person went with it and voted for the…. the…. man.
I can respect that. Disagree with it, but respect it.
So far, the Virginia Democrats seem to have backed off of door-to-door confiscation. But if there’s no grandfathering (see HB961), and the state can get a list of who owns now-prohibited stuff, why wouldn’t they confiscate items that are evidence of a crime? Don’t they have a moral obligation to seize known contraband?
It’s reasonable to ask: How do they get a list? FFLs in Virginia will presumably keep records of firearm sales. As for soon-to-be-banned suppressors, if a Democrat gets elected in November, the ATF’s National Firearms Act records might be available for perusal. Records relating to standard capacity magazines might be a bit more difficult. On the other hand, if purchased with a credit card, those records may be available via legal process. Look at Amazon agreeing to give Massachusetts state officials a data dump of its sellers.