Typical Democrat malfeasance for total control (or in this instance, sheer stupidity by an administration that should know better) to ban and/or severely-restrict one type of firearm/weapon component/accessory….. That gets upheld in the court system….. Then ban another, then another, another and so on.
No matter which way the 10th en banc rules on the bump stock case, it’s gonna go to SCOTUS and if - a big if - if the case is given certiorari, the opinion will be the usual 4 + 4….. and ‘Him’ siding with….. ?
My instant thoughts on reading the article:
B.O.H.I.C.A.
Typical Democrat malfeasance for total control (or in this instance, sheer stupidity by an administration that should know better) to ban and/or severely-restrict one type of firearm/weapon component/accessory….. That gets upheld in the court system….. Then ban another, then another, another and so on.
No matter which way the 10th en banc rules on the bump stock case, it’s gonna go to SCOTUS and if - a big if - if the case is given certiorari, the opinion will be the usual 4 + 4….. and ‘Him’ siding with….. ?