1. 3
  1.  

  2. 1

    Are ‘Stay At Home’ Orders Constitutional ?…… In a nutshell, no.

    From the article:

    ……even emergency and health-protective laws have to be constitutional. The constitution protects our liberty in good times and bad and it explicitly provides for only very limited emergency power. It only allows the suspension of the ordinary judicial process in the event of war, invasion, or rebellion. Furthermore, this authority is granted to Congress and not to the president (even if he calls himself a “wartime president”) or to state and local governments. So even during this crisis, the states must obey the ordinary constitutional restrictions on their powers.

    Tell that to the several governors (two of whom who should know better - Abbot-TX and my governor, DeSantis-FL) who ordered state L.E.O.’s and NatGuard to stop every specific-state-tagged vehicle at their state lines and demand…… “Zho uzz joo payperz, schnell !”

    Also within the article - and this is ‘a bit’ concerning…… In 1905, The Supreme Court of The United States sided with The State of Massachusetts and forced a pastor to be vaccinated against his will and beliefs.

    IMHO, the difference between 1905 and now though, are the power players on the (ICR2P one-world) government/corporate side being much more powerful and dangerous with their agenda to ‘tag’ and completely control every citizen on the planet.