I think it’s fair to say this is David French-ism at its best, or nearly at its best (David French-ism is probably at its best on religious liberty cases).
It’s disappointing to see a majority of justices engage in legal contortions to prop up the power of the administrative state.
I think it’s fair to say this is David French-ism at its best, or nearly at its best (David French-ism is probably at its best on religious liberty cases).
It’s disappointing to see a majority of justices engage in legal contortions to prop up the power of the administrative state.
But such are the decisions that indicate whether the current constitutional arrangement is salvageable.