I think I prefer the robber-baron greed of Facebook to the sanctimonious subterfuge of Twitter.
Yup. It would have been honest for @jack to say: “The Democrat Party dominates legacy media, Hollywood, universities, and foundations. Sadly, we’ve found that these pesky conservatives are organizing on the Internet and social media nevertheless. It’s possible that social media ads elected Donald Trump. We can’t risk that happening again. After all, Twitter is in the tank for the Dems–did you know not a single one of our employees donated to Dem candidates for 2020?”
But Twitter management is not honest. Especially when censoring the dissident right and deplatforming conservatives. We get sanctimonious subterfuge instead.
If Hillary Clinton says she is “very outspoken” about Facebook supposedly doing the wrong thing, and Twitter supposedly doing the right thing, then we can safely assume the opposite is true.
I think I prefer the robber-baron greed of Facebook to the sanctimonious subterfuge of Twitter.
Yup. It would have been honest for @jack to say: “The Democrat Party dominates legacy media, Hollywood, universities, and foundations. Sadly, we’ve found that these pesky conservatives are organizing on the Internet and social media nevertheless. It’s possible that social media ads elected Donald Trump. We can’t risk that happening again. After all, Twitter is in the tank for the Dems–did you know not a single one of our employees donated to Dem candidates for 2020?”
But Twitter management is not honest. Especially when censoring the dissident right and deplatforming conservatives. We get sanctimonious subterfuge instead.
If Hillary Clinton says she is “very outspoken” about Facebook supposedly doing the wrong thing, and Twitter supposedly doing the right thing, then we can safely assume the opposite is true.
Video of Hillary Clinton saying this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Jjhim4hQRI&feature=youtu.be&t=195