These state/local laws that duplicate, expand and complicate the rules for firearm purchases are having their intended effects of marginally reducing commerce in firearms. The unintended effects will be that firearm purchases (and other types of transfers) will still happen in places other than Walmart.
Figuring out where those “other places” are is an exercise left to the reader, and already strained law enforcement agencies.
This seems to be the final version of the New Mexico bill, SB 8, which took effect on July 1: https://nmlegis.gov/Sessions/19%20Regular/final/SB0008.pdf
Legislative history of SB 8: https://nmlegis.gov/Legislation/Legislation?Chamber=S&LegType=B&LegNo=8&year=19
The primary impact seems to be that private party sales (except family, law enforcement) are banned. But the odd thing is that SB 8 doesn’t seem to change much, if anything, from the perspective of a firearm retailer.
Am I missing something? Or is there another separate law that also took effect July 1?
You’re not missing anything. But the ideas that ”commerce” should only take place in government approved stores is an idea worthy of being discredited, every bit as much as nonsense gun control measures.
Here’s some more background from this article, below. It sounds like Walmart is OK with selling firearms in New Mexico (at least shotguns and rifles that aren’t black and scary).
But they don’t want to have to deal with being an intermediary for private party sales. So they stopped selling firearms. Now, the new state law could have been written in a way that let firearm dealers choose whether or not they wanted to handle private party transfers. It was not. So fewer guns will be sold. Which seems to be precisely the point.