The weaker version of the sanctuary resolution being approved in some free states says something like “we respect the Second Amendment.” I guess that’s nice?
The stronger version, which is actually useful and is mentioned in this article, prohibits local law enforcement from assisting federal police who are violating the Second Amendment.
What’s interesting is that Texas law enforcement officers swear this oath, which you can find in Article 16, Section 1 of the Texas Constitution (Attorney General Opinion DM-381 (1996) made it standard for police as well):
“I, _______________________, do solemnly swear (or affirm), that I will faithfully execute the duties of the office of ___________________ of the State of Texas, and will to the best of my ability preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States and of this State, so help me God.”
I wonder, if we keep going down this path, whether some Texas law enforcement officers will decide that mandatory forcible AR-15 confiscation violates the “Constitution and laws of the United States and of this State.”
The weaker version of the sanctuary resolution being approved in some free states says something like “we respect the Second Amendment.” I guess that’s nice?
The stronger version, which is actually useful and is mentioned in this article, prohibits local law enforcement from assisting federal police who are violating the Second Amendment.
What’s interesting is that Texas law enforcement officers swear this oath, which you can find in Article 16, Section 1 of the Texas Constitution (Attorney General Opinion DM-381 (1996) made it standard for police as well):
I wonder, if we keep going down this path, whether some Texas law enforcement officers will decide that mandatory forcible AR-15 confiscation violates the “Constitution and laws of the United States and of this State.”